View Full Version : 2005 U15 quad??
joe king
17th April 2005, 12:30
im very surprised that no1 has started a topic about this. any1 no why not?
Jens
17th April 2005, 17:04
Sorry lads but I hav 2 say England doesnt stand a chance in the u15 Quad this year!
Ireland has it in the bag!!
CUM ON IRELAND! :D
feeder
17th April 2005, 17:54
You really think that Ireland can do anything? England or Scotland to win or even Wales for an upset. I heard that Wales beat everyone at the Celtic Challenge and the best Irish are there!
Jens
17th April 2005, 21:49
The Celtic Challenge is jus a warm up compition 4 da Irish. We will cum out top dis year at da Quad. Wait and see....
CUM ON IRELAND! :D
Badboy
17th April 2005, 22:53
Englands put in quite a young team u-14 squad, but they should be able to carry their own
feeder
18th April 2005, 07:27
If Ireland think warming up by loosing to Wales is prearation for Quad then its SCOTLAND all the way !!! Easy :p
R England good enough at U14 ...
Thumb
18th April 2005, 12:46
just member half the Scotland team are also u14 but picked on merit.
England can pick who they like but at the end of the day if they
lose don't come back with the excuses of a young team
may the best team win (GO SCOTLAND)
feeder
18th April 2005, 22:17
With all these u14's playing is it too much of a risk. Ireland and Wales have strong u15 players and some Welsh boys even win in English Gade 2 competitions. That dutch boy playing for the weslh is good.
Still think the team in blue will win to.
Badboy
18th April 2005, 22:22
How have they done in the selects, as some of the England players do punch above their weight and are european champions at their age, do the scottish, welsh or irish have such credentials?
wilf
18th April 2005, 22:27
With all these u14's playing is it too much of a risk. Ireland and Wales have strong u15 players and some Welsh boys even win in English Gade 2 competitions. That dutch boy playing for the weslh is good.
Still think the team in blue will win to.
ive herd that rich morris guy from ENGLAND!!!! had a pulled glutius maximus and still cained the scottish no 1.
Thumb
19th April 2005, 06:57
Badboy, how can England have European champions at that age -
there are no European Championships for that age group.
They may have won a tournament in Europe with
invited entrants, that does not make them European
champions
wilf
19th April 2005, 08:15
Badboy, how can England have European champions at that age -
there are no European Championships for that age group.
They may have won a tournament in Europe with
invited entrants, that does not make them European
champions
they may not have european champions but they are certainly better than the welsh scottish or irish people of that age. especially gabby white. She would razz all of u otha ppl up.
sonyericsson
19th April 2005, 11:59
i agree in my opinion i think that if england put out a full team with the likes of gabby white, rich morris, England would win easily at half pace, and thats why England have put an u14 team out because it would not help with the development of the full age u15 England players, and would very pointless,especially for the likes of gabby as she is easily one of if not the best in europe!
Shabba69
19th April 2005, 13:52
i know that England have entered some u13's to play in the event as well!!!
Badboy
19th April 2005, 15:43
What i meant was that some of the u-14's entered were european champions last year, not current but for their age group u-14 they are still the best in europe until proved otherwise. And the two u-13's, Panuga is a very talented singles player who does go to a sort of badminton boarding school and so has improved dramatically and sarah is the next best u-13. But as some one else said, for these its all about experiance rather then the winning, im sure they look at it that way too..... :rolleyes:
Shabba69
19th April 2005, 16:07
I agree with u, everyone needs experience to win, you need to practise everyday to show determination if you are serious about the sport, don't u think? I agree the u-14s are the best until proven otherwise. Panuga has improved dramatically I feel.
joe king
19th April 2005, 16:52
so any1 no who is piked for scotland?
also do u agree with who was piked and who wasnt and why?
wilf
19th April 2005, 17:16
so any1 no who is piked for scotland?
also do u agree with who was piked and who wasnt and why?
hu cares. they prob suck lol. jokin. But our lads and lasses wud take any 1 from scotland easily (in bado that is)
scotland2004
19th April 2005, 22:29
ive herd that rich morris guy from ENGLAND!!!! had a pulled glutius maximus and still cained the scottish no 1.[/QUOTE]
I dont think 15-13 in the third is a canining? Do u? I think Scotland have the quad, the boys will be to strong for any of the other country's. Scotland all the way for the quad!
scotland2004
19th April 2005, 22:32
hu cares. they prob suck lol. jokin. But our lads and lasses wud take any 1 from scotland easily (in bado that is)
What are you on about? Scotland boy's could take any counrty at the quad? They have the results down in england and in Belgium!
wilf
20th April 2005, 07:58
ive herd that rich morris guy from ENGLAND!!!! had a pulled glutius maximus and still cained the scottish no 1.
I dont think 15-13 in the third is a canining? Do u? I think Scotland have the quad, the boys will be to strong for any of the other country's. Scotland all the way for the quad![/QUOTE]
well its def a win int it and i think any win is a cainin if ur injured! cos if he wernt injured he prob wudda won much easier.
scotland2004
20th April 2005, 16:09
He was injured after the tournament and he had still beaten all the other top English boys.
wilf
20th April 2005, 16:14
He was injured after the tournament and he had still beaten all the other top English boys.
i'll admit we havnt got that many more gr8 boys. Reynolds is probably the best. But morris wud cain u ne way. And gabby certianly wud
scotland2004
20th April 2005, 20:57
i'll admit we havnt got that many more gr8 boys. Reynolds is probably the best. But morris wud cain u ne way. And gabby certianly wud
Reynolds half the scottish team could beat him! And you dont even know what your talking about Gabby would beat me!!!
wilf
20th April 2005, 20:58
Reynolds half the scottish team could beat him! And you dont even know what your talking about Gabby would beat me!!!
hu r u? if we dont know who u r then god knows if she can beat u or not.
Badboy
20th April 2005, 22:25
i wouldnt mind gabby beating me...
oops anyway
er yeah whatever wilf says, and reynolds is a little bundle of spunk, you scottish couldnt handle his mojo.
wilf
20th April 2005, 22:30
i wouldnt mind gabby beating me...
oops anyway
er yeah whatever wilf says, and reynolds is a little bundle of spunk, you scottish couldnt handle his mojo.
well i wud prob lose ne 1 at singles, i got egged by kate robertshaw and i'm sure she will prob tell u all bout it if u ask her lol. She wont let it go. Reynolds cud prob cain all u scottish!!!! u lot prob cudnt even beat avon. (staffs).
Badboy
20th April 2005, 22:50
Good job Will dont play for england, he'd lose to the welsh, hes got it down to a fine art against glamorgan players...
wilf
21st April 2005, 08:12
Good job Will dont play for england, he'd lose to the welsh, hes got it down to a fine art against glamorgan players...
1 player!!!!! n it ws 21-19. May i say that, i only lost one game that day and only game the day after which ws to bruce so i dont think u can blame me that much! avon avon avon avon avon avon avon avon avon avon avon avon avon avon
scotland2004
21st April 2005, 16:03
well i wud prob lose ne 1 at singles, i got egged by kate robertshaw and i'm sure she will prob tell u all bout it if u ask her lol. She wont let it go. Reynolds cud prob cain all u scottish!!!! u lot prob cudnt even beat avon. (staffs).
Go and get your facts right. You dont know what you are talking about "Reynolds could bt every1 fi Scotland!"
wilf
21st April 2005, 17:16
Go and get your facts right. You dont know what you are talking about "Reynolds could bt every1 fi Scotland!"
calm down m8. Just a joke! u kno wot one is up there?
Little John
21st April 2005, 20:50
Scotland2004 or Mr Campbell. I have seen you play Rich Morris more than once this season, but I forget tell me, what is your cutrent form against him? how many matches have you won against how many he has won against you??:
I do think however you will be too strong for the England U14's you will come across at the quad!
And Wilf remind me, how many times have you represented your country to date??
wilf
21st April 2005, 22:03
Scotland2004 or Mr Campbell. I have seen you play Rich Morris more than once this season, but I forget tell me, what is your cutrent form against him? how many matches have you won against how many he has won against you??:
I do think however you will be too strong for the England U14's you will come across at the quad!
And Wilf remind me, how many times have you represented your country to date??
tell me, how many times did i say i have represented my country? i didnt exactly. So heres a slightly weird common sense suggestion, shut ur mouth and get ur facts str8 before u say things tryin to offend ppl. is that too hard to do?
Little John
21st April 2005, 22:18
Hey Wilf.As I suspected you can call the shots on others, but throw a little corn down and you take the bait, hook line and sinker!!!! :) :) :)
wilf
22nd April 2005, 07:56
Hey Wilf.As I suspected you can call the shots on others, but throw a little corn down and you take the bait, hook line and sinker!!!! :) :) :)
call me stupid, but i thort this ws a badminton website not fishin? i meant correct me if i am rong but u can ask a lot of ppl, i am almost neva rong.
Badboy
22nd April 2005, 22:14
badminton, fishing, poker its all the same
but iv represented my country yes thats right, its a number less than one.
scotland2004
22nd April 2005, 22:44
Scotland2004 or Mr Campbell. I have seen you play Rich Morris more than once this season, but I forget tell me, what is your cutrent form against him? how many matches have you won against how many he has won against you??:
I do think however you will be too strong for the England U14's you will come across at the quad!
And Wilf remind me, how many times have you represented your country to date??
I lost both times but they were both quite close and i was saying that i can still beat all the other English boys. So i was proving my point that Scottish boys can keep up with the English!
wilf
22nd April 2005, 22:47
I lost both times but they were both quite close and i was saying that i can still beat all the other English boys. So i was proving my point that Scottish boys can keep up with the English!
i wud like to point out that i hav neva lost to anyone from scotland or ireland. Shame bout that bloke from glamorgan.
Phil McBride
23rd April 2005, 00:03
i wud like to point out that i hav neva lost to anyone from scotland or ireland. Shame bout that bloke from glamorgan.
So you've never played anyone from Scotland or Ireland then :p
Phil McBride
23rd April 2005, 00:04
but iv represented my country yes thats right, its a number less than one.
That would be zero then :confused:
Anyone go any info on the tourney?
wilf
23rd April 2005, 14:50
So you've never played anyone from Scotland or Ireland then :p
ive have indeed actually. Ive played 3 scottish and 4 irish.
rej
23rd April 2005, 18:07
Where r u from wilf ????????????????
Phil McBride
23rd April 2005, 18:11
ive have indeed actually. Ive played 3 scottish and 4 irish.
Playing against any next weekend Wilf?
wilf
23rd April 2005, 22:53
Playing against any next weekend Wilf?
i am from notts and i am not cos i have shires league finals. Up the notts!!!!
Phil McBride
24th April 2005, 00:52
Oh I see, your're that good you don't need to attend the quad because it is beneath you :eek:
Have you ever lost to anyone Wilf? (except the guy from Glamorgan :p )
wilf
24th April 2005, 18:24
Oh I see, your're that good you don't need to attend the quad because it is beneath you :eek:
Have you ever lost to anyone Wilf? (except the guy from Glamorgan :p )
although it may appear that way, i am not invincible. I am actually ****e at singles.
Phil McBride
24th April 2005, 20:01
although it may appear that way, i am not invincible. I am actually ****e at singles.
Ha ha, touche :D
flamingjam
24th April 2005, 20:26
as the english lot ar U14 mainly i find hightly unlikely that wilf would b part of the team and so not attending the tourney....perhaps cos of his age phil not abililty :D
wilf
24th April 2005, 20:28
as the english lot ar U14 mainly i find hightly unlikely that wilf would b part of the team and so not attending the tourney....perhaps cos of his age phil not abililty :D
u kno wot, u make a very very gud point. And also a very funny point considerin ive beaten all the u15s n e way. i rekon i might get in if i ws young enuff
flamingjam
24th April 2005, 21:27
yer well i thk even i would stand a chance agaist U14 players you no..hehe i thk they might notice a slight error if we turned up and played :p height being a main prob :confused:
wilf
24th April 2005, 22:53
yer well i thk even i would stand a chance agaist U14 players you no..hehe i thk they might notice a slight error if we turned up and played :p height being a main prob :confused:
lol. Hu r u?
Phil McBride
24th April 2005, 22:59
yer well i thk even i would stand a chance agaist U14 players you no..hehe i thk they might notice a slight error if we turned up and played :p height being a main prob :confused:
I might stand a chance :confused: but have you ever seen a 14 stone 14 year old with a beard :eek:
If you were in a jam you could always sight hormone difficulties :D
In saying that I might try and give the U11's a game first and see if I could get a point :o
flamingjam
25th April 2005, 19:58
ar gud stuff ther phil yer 'sight hormone difficulties' gud one neva seen it work mind :p seriously mind good luck to the england lot.. expecting gud wins to be honest ...even if wilf me n phil dont turn up sightin them slight hormone difficulties
ps '14 year old with a beard ' you cud always shave phil, but is it worth it :D
me wilf ha J Ricks ..derbys
wilf
25th April 2005, 21:04
ar gud stuff ther phil yer 'sight hormone difficulties' gud one neva seen it work mind :p seriously mind good luck to the england lot.. expecting gud wins to be honest ...even if wilf me n phil dont turn up sightin them slight hormone difficulties
ps '14 year old with a beard ' you cud always shave phil, but is it worth it :D
me wilf ha J Ricks ..derbys
ahhhh. sry but still means nothing to me. The last person i knew from derby ws richard woolgar and i hated him!
flamingjam
25th April 2005, 22:09
richard woolgar ......yer i hated him 2 wat a story that was refused to play for the county in 2 succesive seasons and ICT's rankin and abililty has suffererd for it mind...fool :p
Phil McBride
25th April 2005, 22:46
Are both Scotland and England fielding what is looking like U14 squads?
flamingjam
25th April 2005, 22:52
heard thats wat england are doing dunno bout the scots i doubt otherwise i think england will win easy if its U14vU14 and scots may hav to battle verus ireland n wales U15';s
wilf
26th April 2005, 15:42
heard thats wat england are doing dunno bout the scots i doubt otherwise i think england will win easy if its U14vU14 and scots may hav to battle verus ireland n wales U15';s
i thort it ws just england that are putting out an u14 squad that if u ask me will rpob still beat most of the players.
flamingjam
26th April 2005, 19:05
yer my understanding is the same as yours wilf as is wat ive been told
wilf
26th April 2005, 22:35
yer my understanding is the same as yours wilf as is wat ive been told
england will still prob win aswell. But i rekon it will b close. If england put out a pull u15 side they wud cain u!
opinion
27th April 2005, 04:37
Scotland have a mixture of u14/u15 players, majority u15. I think Scotland will win.
opinion
27th April 2005, 04:54
Wilf. You seem to be talk talk talking as if you are actually a good player.
Arthur, Jamie, Victor, Robert, Nigel, Kamran, Daniel, Jack.
Correct me if im wrong because im finding it difficult to understand the ages and rankings, but is that not 8 boys that are ranked higher than you in doubles? and roughly near enough the same names and numbers with mixed?
And seen as you're '****e' at singles I'd say you're nothing special. You should perhaps worry about beating boys in your own country first before even thinking about who u can and can't beat in the rest of the UK. I think you should perhaps win a national title or have a decent european ranking and then gibber on as if you know whats happening.
:)
wilf
27th April 2005, 08:03
Wilf. You seem to be talk talk talking as if you are actually a good player.
Arthur, Jamie, Victor, Robert, Nigel, Kamran, Daniel, Jack.
Correct me if im wrong because im finding it difficult to understand the ages and rankings, but is that not 8 boys that are ranked higher than you in doubles? and roughly near enough the same names and numbers with mixed?
And seen as you're '****e' at singles I'd say you're nothing special. You should perhaps worry about beating boys in your own country first before even thinking about who u can and can't beat in the rest of the UK. I think you should perhaps win a national title or have a decent european ranking and then gibber on as if you know whats happening.
:)
go 4 it m8, u come ova here and beat chris adcock and i will give u a handshake cos it ant as easy as it seems to win a national title. Ask nigel or victor or arthur cos if i'm not mistaken ive beaten them all at singles, ive beaten danni at doubles ive only eva played jack once so before u start goin bout how gr8 u r, u shud come ova to england to c how badminton is really played.
Badboy
27th April 2005, 09:25
u shud come ova to england to c how badminton is really played.
Ladies and Gentlemen, Amen.
wilf
27th April 2005, 17:35
Ladies and Gentlemen, Amen.
lol!! sing it ma brother!!!
flamingjam
27th April 2005, 18:40
who the hecks ....opinion anyhow he went in a bit harshly there .....specially considering the quality on this side of the border :p
if wilf mananged to be top of his county in singles, then he would be.....well like national champion and one of the best in europe, may even forget where scotland is with the fame going to his head :D
im not sure how opinion can critise.. id like to know his name first....and then ask if he's beaten people like Arthur and Kam?
Phil McBride
27th April 2005, 19:09
u shud come ova to england to c how badminton is really played.
Why? Are the Chinese national squad playing in England?
wilf
27th April 2005, 19:23
Why? Are the Chinese national squad playing in England?
hu r the chinese national squad? do u mean the actual one?
Phil McBride
27th April 2005, 19:30
hu r the chinese national squad? do u mean the actual one?
Yes, do try and keep up Wilf
Badboy
27th April 2005, 19:53
Yes, do try and keep up Wilf
Get told will.
But if yer do become #1 singles player in yer county then you aint done too bad i spose, only mills n adcock in the way.
wilf
27th April 2005, 19:54
Get told will.
But if yer do become #1 singles player in yer county then you aint done too bad i spose, only mills n adcock in the way.
u gotta admit i dont really stand much of a chance winning the nationals if i lose 2 daz? i mean come on, u crnt expect me to take cadcock can u?
Phil McBride
27th April 2005, 22:34
u gotta admit i dont really stand much of a chance winning the nationals if i lose 2 daz? i mean come on, u crnt expect me to take cadcock can u?
Yes! Where there's a Will there's a way!
Sorry couldn't resist :p
wilf
27th April 2005, 22:36
Yes! Where there's a Will there's a way!
Sorry couldn't resist :p
neva! say that again cos it really wsnt funny. Always go by the rule, if no-one else is laffin, then its not funny.
Phil McBride
27th April 2005, 22:54
neva! say that again cos it really wsnt funny. Always go by the rule, if no-one else is laffin, then its not funny.
Will this is the internet, how can I see if anyone is laughing :confused:
You're a bit of a left boob are you not?
Badboy
27th April 2005, 23:46
made me chuckle anyway.
As our er, scottish expert then Phil, who is there too watch from up north?
any Scottish wizards on the move?
Phil McBride
28th April 2005, 07:10
made me chuckle anyway.
any Scottish wizards on the move?
Gandalf the grey
wilf
28th April 2005, 07:56
Gandalf the grey
that pretty much sums it up then
Badboy
28th April 2005, 09:52
Well from England Panuga might do well in the singles, certainly considering shes u-13 and in the doubles and Mixed Anna Wilson and Emma Woolley should do well, maybe even in singles if she moves her backside occasionally.
donnakabab
28th April 2005, 14:01
im not in under 15's but i keep hearin bout ross little,mark middleton ,micheal mellor n gary fox r these guys gona b big in the future? n also how gd is matthew nottingham n phil aspinal? i think their u13's n ive heard theve own quite a bit in their ages are these gona b like prodigy children?
wilf
28th April 2005, 17:09
im not in under 15's but i keep hearin bout ross little,mark middleton ,micheal mellor n gary fox r these guys gona b big in the future? n also how gd is matthew nottingham n phil aspinal? i think their u13's n ive heard theve own quite a bit in their ages are these gona b like prodigy children?
the u15 ones rnt that gud. lol. Ive seen betta lets just put it that way. Mark is actually u14 and will b gud wen hes older but i wudnt bank on the othas
wilf
28th April 2005, 17:10
the u15 ones rnt that gud. lol. Ive seen betta lets just put it that way. Mark is actually u14 and will b gud wen hes older but i wudnt bank on the othas
if u want a gr8 u15 look at morris, hes prob the best ur gonna get at that age by a country mile
donnakabab
28th April 2005, 18:37
If they were around when you were that age could you have beaten them?
wilf
28th April 2005, 18:46
If they were around when you were that age could you have beaten them?
i was around at their age and still yeh, they ant n e thin special cos i am crap!
rej
28th April 2005, 18:55
very modist
wilf
28th April 2005, 19:05
very modist
i like to stay down to earth lol :)
opinion
28th April 2005, 23:24
I'd like to start by saying im not a boy. But instead a national champion and have a European ranking of less than 7. In other words, im better than yous.
feeder
29th April 2005, 07:23
Who's up first in the team matches?
wilf
29th April 2005, 07:59
I'd like to start by saying im not a boy. But instead a national champion and have a European ranking of less than 7. In other words, im better than yous.
ok big head lol.
wolfie smith
29th April 2005, 11:16
Girls can we have a serious discussion instead of all this stuff.
You lot don't seem to know what end of the racket to hold let alone talk about the game and how good you are.
Power to the people
wilf
29th April 2005, 18:24
Girls can we have a serious discussion instead of all this stuff.
You lot don't seem to know what end of the racket to hold let alone talk about the game and how good you are.
Power to the people
how bout u shut up? theres a suggestion. I think a lot of us might just know how to hold a racket. Ive only been holdin racket since i ws 5 years old.
Phil McBride
29th April 2005, 18:31
how bout u shut up? theres a suggestion. I think a lot of us might just know how to hold a racket. Ive only been holdin racket since i ws 5 years old.
Thats a very long time to hold a racket!
Do you ever put it down to go to the toilet? Does your arm not get very sore?
wilf
29th April 2005, 19:41
Thats a very long time to hold a racket!
Do you ever put it down to go to the toilet? Does your arm not get very sore?
oh yeh its very painful. How old r u ne way? 5?
Phil McBride
29th April 2005, 22:55
oh yeh its very painful. How old r u ne way? 5?
nearly right - 4.
I might actually make under 11's in a few years
wilf
29th April 2005, 23:04
nearly right - 4.
I might actually make under 11's in a few years
i'm guessin that u might just b older than that, and since u put on a quote before that u had a beard i am guessin that u r quite old. Which brings me to the point, why are you on a junior forum?
Badboy
29th April 2005, 23:40
Which brings me onto my next point;
England played ireland, scotland played wales
All i know is that england took a girls doubles,
any one got anythin more?
Phil McBride
30th April 2005, 07:50
i'm guessin that u might just b older than that, and since u put on a quote before that u had a beard i am guessin that u r quite old. Which brings me to the point, why are you on a junior forum?
Sorry, I'll try to stick to the adult forum. Oh that's right there isn't one :rolleyes:
Sorry to have upset you Wilf, I'll digress back to the banter section for being too old to post in the junior forum :o
And to answer your question - 28 and helping a coach with a junior squad so any insight is usefull.
Thumb
30th April 2005, 11:10
Scotland bt Wales and Eng bt Ireland. Don't know the scores.
This morn Scot play Ireland then Eng play Wales.
Looks like this afternoon's game cd be decider Scotland v England
chenhong
30th April 2005, 12:03
"how bout u shut up? theres a suggestion. I think a lot of us might just know how to hold a racket. Ive only been holdin racket since i ws 5 years old."
and ur still crap!
wilf
30th April 2005, 22:20
"how bout u shut up? theres a suggestion. I think a lot of us might just know how to hold a racket. Ive only been holdin racket since i ws 5 years old."
and ur still crap!
i didnt say ive been holdin a squash racket u penis
there are otha games which use rackets
Badboy
30th April 2005, 22:24
1. chen hong there is a quote button, use it.
2.wilf, from lookin at you i never thought youd held a racket in your life.
3.for anyone that cares about the topic of this thread, england won the team event beating scotland and wales today
chenhong
1st May 2005, 10:05
i didnt say ive been holdin a squash racket u penis
there are otha games which use rackets
yeah i know you didn't mean a squash racket, i am just saying dat you are crap, plain and simple!
yeah i know you didn't mean a squash racket, i am just saying dat you are crap, plain and simple!
hu r u? cos u can hardly tlk if we dont even kno hu u r
well england won the overall team event. And in the gals individual i kno that emma and anna won the girls doubles beating sarah and sum gal in the final.
michael r
2nd May 2005, 21:24
What i meant was that some of the u-14's entered were european champions last year, not current but for their age group u-14 they are still the best in europe until proved otherwise. And the two u-13's, Panuga is a very talented singles player who does go to a sort of badminton boarding school and so has improved dramatically and sarah is the next best u-13. But as some one else said, for these its all about experiance rather then the winning, im sure they look at it that way too..... :rolleyes:
No no its not just about experience for Panuga she wants to win thats why she has just won the under 15 quadrangular in Ireland
No no its not just about experience for Panuga she wants to win thats why she has just won the under 15 quadrangular in Ireland
pretty impressive
Badboy
2nd May 2005, 23:09
Who doesnt want to win? the difference was that Panuga was good enough to do it and well done to her, she managed to win her way there quite convincingly as well, bodes well for the future... :D
Phil McBride
3rd May 2005, 01:48
No no its not just about experience for Panuga she wants to win thats why she has just won the under 15 quadrangular in Ireland
She won because she wants to win - hmmm, interesting! So you only win if you want it enough?
I really want to win the lottery this Wednesday do you think it'll happen?
I think you'll find that she was the best player in that hall at that time, that is why she won - nothing else. To think that she wanted it more than the others is a bit odd.
She won because she wants to win - hmmm, interesting! So you only win if you want it enough?
I really want to win the lottery this Wednesday do you think it'll happen?
I think you'll find that she was the best player in that hall at that time, that is why she won - nothing else. To think that she wanted it more than the others is a bit odd.
there is such thing as wanting things more than everyone else u know. U dont just go into the game not givin a **** bout hu wins or hu wins n hu loses. U do wanna win and u can wanna win more than otha people.
michael r
3rd May 2005, 17:21
She won because she wants to win - hmmm, interesting! So you only win if you want it enough?
I really want to win the lottery this Wednesday do you think it'll happen?
I think you'll find that she was the best player in that hall at that time, that is why she won - nothing else. To think that she wanted it more than the others is a bit odd.
Dont think you quite understand the point lots of players give up when loosing not this girl
Phil McBride
3rd May 2005, 18:12
Dont think you quite understand the point lots of players give up when loosing not this girl
No, not lots of players but mentally weak players give up. You can tell a lot about players by their body language and also you can see what is inside when they play, their heart shines through and you can tell players apart when the games get hard.
To have said she won because she wnated it more is just plain ridiculous, the vasy majority of the players involved wanted to win, some would go in thinking that they had an outside chance but for one person to be head and shoulders above the rest solely because they wanted it more is a bit wide of the mark. There would be players there who thought themselves invincible. Not everyone mind but for those in their first competition of this calibre they might have been a bit nervous but they would still wanted to win above all else.
Phil McBride
3rd May 2005, 18:13
there is such thing as wanting things more than everyone else u know. U dont just go into the game not givin a **** bout hu wins or hu wins n hu loses. U do wanna win and u can wanna win more than otha people.
Really Wilf?
Please do try and be a little more condisending :rolleyes:
How do you measure someones drive to win compared to the next person?
No, not lots of players but mentally weak players give up. You can tell a lot about players by their body language and also you can see what is inside when they play, their heart shines through and you can tell players apart when the games get hard.
To have said she won because she wnated it more is just plain ridiculous, the vasy majority of the players involved wanted to win, some would go in thinking that they had an outside chance but for one person to be head and shoulders above the rest solely because they wanted it more is a bit wide of the mark. There would be players there who thought themselves invincible. Not everyone mind but for those in their first competition of this calibre they might have been a bit nervous but they would still wanted to win above all else.
i didnt say that u can b head and shoulders above the rest by wanting it more, but it can spur u on that extra bit. If you took 2 identical players in ability and said one of them wanted it more u wud think that person wud win wouldnt u?
Phil McBride
3rd May 2005, 22:24
i didnt say that u can b head and shoulders above the rest by wanting it more, but it can spur u on that extra bit. If you took 2 identical players in ability and said one of them wanted it more u wud think that person wud win wouldnt u?
No, there are more variables to take into account than ability Wilf. You cannot account for the individual.
No, there are more variables to take into account than ability Wilf. You cannot account for the individual.
i dont deny that but u gotta say how much a person wants it can b one of those variables
Phil McBride
4th May 2005, 05:50
i dont deny that but u gotta say how much a person wants it can b one of those variables
Not to the extent you are taking it and if you are trying to prove it then you are onto a loser.
Scientifically there are too many variables to consider in a match to give anything which is heresay a fair chance to the extent of it being able to make that much of a difference.
If two people are playing it will very rarely come down to this (the only way this could ever make a difference is if two identical twins were playing and they both had the same rackets, coaching etc, or in fact a mirror image of yourself is the only way you could prove it), more often at this level it comes down to skill, fitness, stamina, technique etc. In other words who is the best player not who wants it more.
Not to the extent you are taking it and if you are trying to prove it then you are onto a loser.
Scientifically there are too many variables to consider in a match to give anything which is heresay a fair chance to the extent of it being able to make that much of a difference.
If two people are playing it will very rarely come down to this (the only way this could ever make a difference is if two identical twins were playing and they both had the same rackets, coaching etc, or in fact a mirror image of yourself is the only way you could prove it), more often at this level it comes down to skill, fitness, stamina, technique etc. In other words who is the best player not who wants it more.
i didnt say that everything went down to who wants it more. I also didnt say that it ws a big variable but i am saying that it is a variable.
Phil McBride
4th May 2005, 19:17
i didnt say that everything went down to who wants it more. I also didnt say that it ws a big variable but i am saying that it is a variable.
Well in the case of it not being a determining factor what are you going on about then?
In life you can control the constants not the variables so why bother worrying about them. In other words we try and control the things that we have direct and indirect influence over to an extent, things we can keep constant or control. We should not try and control variables because for the most part cannot control them or cast influence.
I would still like to hear exactly what Michael R meant then.
Well in the case of it not being a determining factor what are you going on about then?
In life you can control the constants not the variables so why bother worrying about them. In other words we try and control the things that we have direct and indirect influence over to an extent, things we can keep constant or control. We should not try and control variables because for the most part cannot control them or cast influence.
I would still like to hear exactly what Michael R meant then.
i crnt b arsed to read that but ur prob rite.
chenhong
4th May 2005, 19:54
by saying that it comes down to who wants it more it shows that u've been listening to gill clark too much
by saying that it comes down to who wants it more it shows that u've been listening to gill clark too much
untill u tell ppl hu u r, u hav no opinion!
so shut up
Badboy
4th May 2005, 23:33
I do think that wanting to win it more *can* make a difference, however to say the reason why she won was because she wanted it more was a little nieve. Especially at junior level when there can be such a range in ability. Trying to join in the philisophical side of the arguement here, i dont know if i would class desire as a variable afterall, it is us who decides how much you want to win.
and chen hong, get told.
Phil McBride
5th May 2005, 07:23
I do think that wanting to win it more *can* make a difference, however to say the reason why she won was because she wanted it more was a little nieve. Especially at junior level when there can be such a range in ability. Trying to join in the philisophical side of the arguement here, i dont know if i would class desire as a variable afterall, it is us who decides how much you want to win.
and chen hong, get told.
I mean a variable in the form that it would even change from point to point, there is no way to be constant in the drive for a game as other thoughts enter your mind ie. I missed an easy net kill, I hit it out etc.
Especially at that age
There is no way even as adults we can keep the same drive (mentally) going for a whole best of 3 to 15, we cannot keep the same drive physically and get more and more tired as the games go on so it would have a hand in hand effect on the mental side of the game.
I mean a variable in the form that it would even change from point to point, there is no way to be constant in the drive for a game as other thoughts enter your mind ie. I missed an easy net kill, I hit it out etc.
Especially at that age
There is no way even as adults we can keep the same drive (mentally) going for a whole best of 3 to 15, we cannot keep the same drive physically and get more and more tired as the games go on so it would have a hand in hand effect on the mental side of the game.
ok i get ur point uve told me like 5 times now
Phil McBride
5th May 2005, 18:18
ok i get ur point uve told me like 5 times now
And now for a sixth
Take Nathan Robertson as an example, an excelent player but loses the mental edge and his concentration goes, but I would say his drive is there to begin with but it goes along with his concentration. And he is at the top of the game so there is no questioning his drive to win since his financial viability depends on it.
And now for a sixth
Take Nathan Robertson as an example, an excelent player but loses the mental edge and his concentration goes, but I would say his drive is there to begin with but it goes along with his concentration. And he is at the top of the game so there is no questioning his drive to win since his financial viability depends on it.
how has nathan robertson got to do with the u15 quadrangular?
Badboy
5th May 2005, 21:58
Other than perhaps he played in it when he was younger it was a slightly off topic example :P
but then agian i doubt he probably did play with England usual sending its second string or a slightly weaker team, but maybe there was a time when nathan wasnt so good... or was that verging on blasphemous there
chenhong
10th May 2005, 12:25
don't care wilf to be honest, you're crap at badminton as i have seen u, ur poor! n u must never go out as u r constantly on badders.com which aint the most exciting place in the world.
don't care wilf to be honest, you're crap at badminton as i have seen u, ur poor! n u must never go out as u r constantly on badders.com which aint the most exciting place in the world.
woteva i crnt b arsed to argue with ppl ova a website. Wots the point?
Phil McBride
10th May 2005, 18:21
woteva i crnt b arsed to argue with ppl ova a website. Wots the point?
Because it's fun :p
Because it's fun :p
not really. No-one really cares wot ppl think. Its just turned into ppl givin opinions bout otha ppl but nuthin to do with bado. wots the point seriously. I mean chen hong is talkin bout what i do in my free time. I'm gonna ask n e 1, hu gives 2 ****s wot i do in my free time?
chenhong
11th May 2005, 10:58
u obviously do wilf as u posted on ict 05 thread how u played against robert hird n wat u fink about badders. if u didnt care bout ur free time sport, badminton, then i ask this question:
why are u posting on this site?
You No
11th May 2005, 11:23
no offence like but chen hong you are a bit sad if you remember what will said in the ict 05
u obviously do wilf as u posted on ict 05 thread how u played against robert hird n wat u fink about badders. if u didnt care bout ur free time sport, badminton, then i ask this question:
why are u posting on this site?
i think u'll find, if u can read english that i sed ppl dont care wot i do in my free time. playin rob hird ws in ICT so i dont think thats free time, and wen did i say n e thin bout wot otha sports i do? do u stalk me or sumit, lookin at what i say all the time. Calm down m8, its just a website. Ur takin it well seriously.
oi chen hong i got wills back
now u either tell us who you are or u stop sayin nefin coz as far as im concerned if u cant even tell us who u are then u are a pussy and your opinion counts for ****
and chattin about social life, anyone whoo has typed chen hong that many times at the bottom of your screen thing is very socailly deprived
oi chen hong i got wills back
now u either tell us who you are or u stop sayin nefin coz as far as im concerned if u cant even tell us who u are then u are a pussy and your opinion counts for ****
and chattin about social life, anyone whoo has typed chen hong that many times at the bottom of your screen thing is very socailly deprived
ahhhhh u just got rinsed! thats wots called havin friends. u'll learn that sum day
chenhong
12th May 2005, 17:18
i don't give a **** man and by getting ur little cronies on a badminton website to take the piss isn't very hard is it wilf?
~k~ i just don't care wat u fink either, u can't relli get sum1's back on a website.
i don't take this site seriously i just like having a debate n having a laugh which i'm having a lot of with people like ~k~ and wilf posting,i'm actually laughin now thinkin about ur posts, hahaha!
chen hong i tihnk u need a girlfriend
i don't give a **** man and by getting ur little cronies on a badminton website to take the piss isn't very hard is it wilf?
~k~ i just don't care wat u fink either, u can't relli get sum1's back on a website.
i don't take this site seriously i just like having a debate n having a laugh which i'm having a lot of with people like ~k~ and wilf posting,i'm actually laughin now thinkin about ur posts, hahaha!
i'm not trying to b hard. wen did i say that?
chenhong
12th May 2005, 20:26
trying to act dumb now are we wilf, deny wat ur trying to imply!
~k~ got a girlfriend thanks don't need ur help. i dont post on here as much as wilf so i fink he is da one hu needs a gf
trying to act dumb now are we wilf, deny wat ur trying to imply!
~k~ got a girlfriend thanks don't need ur help. i dont post on here as much as wilf so i fink he is da one hu needs a gf
how do we know u hav? it cud b a bf for all we kno. wen did i imply i ws hard? wot the hell has n e of this got to do with badminton?
i love it how he always types out the ~~'s when he writes ~k~ . who are u chen u man of mystery
Badboy
12th May 2005, 22:33
Yeah come on chen put a name to yer game, if your gonna keep mouthin at least give us a name. Its easy to diss someone when you know who they are when we dont know who you are. I could say yer utter bollocks n if you dont know me yer cant say anything.
Oh and calling yerself chen hong then callin other people sad? slightly hypocritical dont yer think?
chenhong
13th May 2005, 11:16
not really hypocritical, chen hong is my favourite player and I am posting on a badminton site...
you have sum guts to say my name is sad wen u r called badboy wen ur not bad. it mite b related to badminton but so is my name so no need for calling each other sad or hypocritical.
Badboy
13th May 2005, 13:31
lol that is true, but i was originally just "matt Gregory" and had badboy as my login name as it was somethin easy to remember, but then when they swapped the servers round i got my cheesy name :(
this chen hong dude rekons hes well clever, jus say who u are stop dodging the quesiotn coz the bottom line is ur too pussy to say who u are
chenhong
14th May 2005, 15:23
nah im not a pussy i just prefer to be anonymous and mysterious, it keeps you youngsters on your toes. try and work out hu it is? use your brains!
~k~ i dont reckon i am clever as that is big headed and im not big headed! so stop making false assumptions.
anyway all you lot asking hu i am has diverted us away from the topic, the under 15 quad. well done to the winners and runner ups, plus the whole team for winning.
woooo long words - falllse assuuumptioons, annnonnymouus, divvertedd, mystteriouss.
chen hong my brain has blown up because of the long words you use, therefore i cannot use it to facilitate myself in discovering your true name . so just tell us
woooo long words - falllse assuuumptioons
hahahahahhahahahahhahaha
Badboy
14th May 2005, 22:37
Yeah, if you not so pussy why dont you tell us? whats the worst that can happen? Badders.com hitsquad? not quite...
Yeah, if you not so pussy why dont you tell us? whats the worst that can happen? Badders.com hitsquad? not quite...
i'm not even that bothered n e more. I am just not going to pay attention to n e thin hes sayin. What positions did the ppl actually come in matt (in the quad).
Badboy
15th May 2005, 00:08
1.England (convincingly)
2.Scotland (comfortably)
3.Ireland ( i think)
4.Wales (maybe)
5.Chen hong (i heard he was lucky to finish last)
1.England (convincingly)
2.Scotland (comfortably)
3.Ireland ( i think)
4.Wales (maybe)
5.Chen hong (i heard he was lucky to finish last)
ur tellin me, after all the scottish sed bout being the best, we beat them with an u14 team? hahahaha!!!chen hongs a loser, wots new
Phil McBride
15th May 2005, 14:16
ur tellin me, after all the scottish sed bout being the best, we beat them with an u14 team? hahahaha!!!chen hongs a loser, wots new
Yes it would appear the English won the team event.
What were the results for the individual events?
Badboy
15th May 2005, 20:20
English dominated the Girls events apart from Gillian sloan, and then the rest was shared around i think, cant really remember
Badboy
15th May 2005, 23:56
I think they also did well in mixed.....(this beign the english)
Phil McBride
16th May 2005, 00:17
Poor show site support!! :mad:
Poor show site support!! :mad:
lol where ws he wen chen hong ws sayin he ws gonna duff us up lol. (which btw for his benefit means make sum 1 pregnant)
chenhong
16th May 2005, 10:37
wilf, wen dus duff sum1 up mean getting them pregnant, is dat nottingham slang or sumthin. neva heard of that. duffing sum1 up in badminton is like caining them or slaughtering them, not getting them pregnant, use ur big head wilf 4 once.
wilf, wen dus duff sum1 up mean getting them pregnant, is dat nottingham slang or sumthin. neva heard of that. duffing sum1 up in badminton is like caining them or slaughtering them, not getting them pregnant, use ur big head wilf 4 once.
nottingham slang? try common sense!
chen hong i love you will you marry me
chen hong i love you will you marry me
hahahahahhaa!!!
Phil McBride
16th May 2005, 18:35
lol where ws he wen chen hong ws sayin he ws gonna duff us up lol. (which btw for his benefit means make sum 1 pregnant)
I was the one backing you up for a change until my apt response was deleted by site support :mad:
Why was that site support? Other than being off topic there was no reason to have it deleted as it was a direct reply to someones insolence
Badboy
16th May 2005, 19:14
Surely the dizzy heights of the junior forum is above such formalities as moderation?!
the thread has obviously ran out of input due to all the foreigners dissapearing after england beat them again, with an u-14 team.
And yes Mr hong, as you would of seen on my post before site support when on a rampage and i had to edit it, it is a phrase accross the country, up the duff or duffing up = getting people pregnant, so dont go sayin that to all yer mates, they might give yer some funny looks to say the least.
chenhong
16th May 2005, 19:26
mite mean getting sum1 pregnant but when u say u f**cked sum1 up in a game of badminton dus dat mean u had sex wid dem-no so i didn't imply i wanted 2 get sum1 pregnant.
chen may i please duff you up
Badboy
16th May 2005, 21:09
yes but you didnt say in a game of badminton, you just said you would duff us up, considering your a self proclaimed genious, you dont think your scentences out very well do you?
something on topic... er were the other nations suprised at their loses?
yes but you didnt say in a game of badminton, you just said you would duff us up, considering your a self proclaimed genious, you dont think your scentences out very well do you?
something on topic... er were the other nations suprised at their loses?
which nations, cos there ws the 6 nations and then there ws the quad?
chenhong
16th May 2005, 21:36
i never said i was a self-proclaimed genius, and as this is a badminton forum i thought u would understand that i wasn't talking about getting someone pregnant, ur acting very patronising and arrogant badboy, r u sure u dont think ur the genius?
i never said i was a self-proclaimed genius, and as this is a badminton forum i thought u would understand that i wasn't talking about getting someone pregnant, ur acting very patronising and arrogant badboy, r u sure u dont think ur the genius?
i thort we ws tlkin bout the nations badminton not hu is a genious. Talk bout it or get off
chenhong
17th May 2005, 16:50
did ur last post tlk bout the different nations-no, u just told me 2 mention it, thats hypocritical wilf,isn't it? in one of my posts i said well done to the england under 14 team for the team event and individual results.
as for the under 17 6 nations, quite obvious denmark is the dominant nation, but england did well to get bronze and some did well in the individual. dissapointed in our boy's singles but max and bruce, our top 2, got hard draws, bruce with larsen 1st round, harsh!
there u go wilf, i have posted about the different nations, y dont u take a leaf out of my book.
did ur last post tlk bout the different nations-no, u just told me 2 mention it, thats hypocritical wilf,isn't it? in one of my posts i said well done to the england under 14 team for the team event and individual results.
as for the under 17 6 nations, quite obvious denmark is the dominant nation, but england did well to get bronze and some did well in the individual. dissapointed in our boy's singles but max and bruce, our top 2, got hard draws, bruce with larsen 1st round, harsh!
there u go wilf, i have posted about the different nations, y dont u take a leaf out of my book.
wot do u think ive been doin genious. but i agree harsh draws but we did well in the other events.
Phil McBride
17th May 2005, 22:45
Full results are here:
http://www.badmintonireland.com/content/templates/news_story.aspx?articleid=75&zoneid=2
rah
19th August 2005, 22:09
undefinedno offence meant to tha english seein as i am english, bt the top scots r way nicer nd more friendly than the top english hu sum can be arrogant and like refuse to talk to ppl hu they consider below them.
ok so the english hav better depth of team therefore they won the team event but the scots hav a few amazin players like gilly nd martin, but every1 keeps dissing the scots on here nd acting like the english rule great british badminton.... fact is the top scottish can beat the top english so.... get over it.... plus they hav way better acccents!
david_legend
3rd September 2005, 00:00
I sevcond what he sayed...but im scottish so im biast as wel :D
michael r
10th November 2005, 22:16
i agree in my opinion i think that if england put out a full team with the likes of gabby white, rich morris, England would win easily at half pace, and thats why England have put an u14 team out because it would not help with the development of the full age u15 England players, and would very pointless,especially for the likes of gabby as she is easily one of if not the best in europe!
Has this not helped the under 14's I mean Enland did they not win do you know who one the singles events
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.